Earners

Customers pay a monthly fee, and a service makes their videos for them, with no one appearing on camera. It recorded 68,101 dollars in one month.

A selfie goes in, and the same face comes back in the style you pick. The app charges by the week and recorded 50,659 dollars in one month.

A subscription tool checks whether your brand shows up in the answers of 6 AI chatbots. It recorded 48,646 dollars in one month.

A software service writes and publishes blog posts for you, to help a site get found in search. Subscriptions recorded 35,285 dollars in one month.

An AI tool that does first-contact sales outreach on LinkedIn and WhatsApp reports 30.2k dollars of monthly recurring revenue from 59 subscriptions.

A tool that automates WhatsApp messages for online shops, founded in January 2026, reports 26.0 thousand dollars of monthly recurring revenue from 249 subscriptions.

A tool that writes and sends LinkedIn outreach with AI reports 24.2k dollars of monthly recurring revenue from 267 subscriptions.

A booking and client-management tool for therapists reports 20.9k dollars of monthly recurring revenue from 370 subscriptions, and 1.15M since it began in 2020.

An AI-native security team has been paid 198,983 dollars for valid bug reports on Immunefi. Only 11.5k came in the last three months, so the pace has cooled.

A tool that lets small businesses build their own AI support chatbot without code reports 17.2k dollars of monthly recurring revenue from 301 subscriptions.

One author's licensed AI clone costs 29 USD a month and draws on 14 books. Only one live example turned up, so treat it as a single find.

A Polish-language chat service where people talk to AI characters reports 7.7k dollars of monthly recurring revenue from 968 subscriptions.

In Shopify's app store, 64% of random AI-named apps have no reviews at all. The survivors are plain utilities, such as an alt-text generator with 180 reviews.

A speech and telecom service earned 5,608 dollars in a month, one small payment per request. It is one of the biggest earners on the tracker.

A pay-per-request page took $4,202.20 over 30 days from 98,154 calls. Five buyers paid, and one of them supplied nearly all of it.

A website that colours old black-and-white photos took 3,912 dollars in 30 days at 1 dollar a photo, while the open-source model behind it costs 0.042 dollars a run.

Two AI apps that show empty rooms furnished for property listings took 2,508 and 2,557 dollars in 30 days, one of them only since November 2025.

One Etsy shop shows 6.3K sales in about a year, selling machine-embroidery files at a flat 7.97 USD. A digital file can sell again and again.

A web service that sells answers one request at a time took $1,781.84 over 30 days from 28,971 calls and 121 buyers. More than half came from one buyer.

One shop's sales counter now reads 4.1K for clinical-hours logs sold to counsellors and therapists. The niche is thin, with just 15 shops.

Plans run from 49 to 490 USD a month for booking and ordering chat agents, and public records hint at only a handful of clients.

An AI tutor for Indian accountancy students gives guests 15,000 free tokens, then sells a 299-rupee monthly pass. It cites official course books, which is the copyright worry.

The seller listed as Pocket Network took in $673.18 in a month from tens of thousands of requests, and a direct check of the blockchain backs it up.

One buyer made about ten thousand paid requests to a single service and paid 441.34 dollars over a month. It is a very lopsided business.

This pay-per-call service took in 398.67 dollars over a month from 734 requests. Nearly all of it came from a single buyer, so the picture is thinner than it looks.

Apify, a known platform, shows 359.47 dollars of pay-per-call income in a month from 18 buyers. It is a small test of a new way of getting paid.

A service selling cheap AI processing took in 305.56 dollars in a month from just 85 requests. One buyer paid most of it.

A seller of market information took in $327.94 in a month, the most among the lopsided sellers here, but nearly all of it came from one buyer.

A paid agent gateway took in $287.99 in a month from only a few hundred requests. That is a high price per request, with buyers well spread.

A young business sells live-interview AI help to job seekers from 449 rupees a session, and an AI first-round interviewer to employers. The job-seeker side is the shaky one.

A service whose name says it referees disputes between software agents took $187.28 in 30 days from 1,018 calls. Three buyers paid, almost all from one.

A reference-data service for Africa earned 214.92 dollars in a month from 222 paid requests. Almost all of the money came from a single buyer.

A seller whose name and web addresses point to social media data took in $182.57 in a month, paid per request, with no buyer dominating.

A service whose name points to AI agents earned $123.93 in a month, but about nine-tenths of the payments came from a single buyer.

A small pay-per-call service took in 177.21 dollars in a month from 70 requests. Fourteen buyers appear, yet one of them paid nearly all of it.

A pay-per-call service earned 176.25 dollars in a month, but spread across 643 different buyers. That works out at pennies each, the opposite of a one-big-customer story.

A service that searches records about software agents took $157.70 in 30 days from 5,329 calls and 28 buyers. Many small payments and no dominant buyer, but a small total.

A small set of utilities for AI programs took in 152.27 dollars in a month from 1,639 paid requests. One buyer accounts for nearly all of it.

A service whose web address hints at social media data earned $138.75 in a month from thousands of tiny paid requests, with no one buyer in charge.

A small pay-per-request gateway took in $133.03 in a month. Nearly all of it came from one buyer, so the real lesson is how fragile a single customer can be.

A pay-per-request site took $124.29 over 30 days from 5 calls, and a single buyer made all of the payments.

A small set of paid tools for software agents - chat, search and browsing - took $113.04 over 30 days from 645 calls and 10 buyers.

A pay-per-request service handled 4,042 calls in a month and took $86.41, almost all of it from one of its 4 buyers.

A lookup for airport codes took $106.62 over 30 days from 662 calls and 14 buyers. Most of it came from one buyer.

A small pay-per-call service earned 105.19 dollars in a month from 155 requests. Most of the money came from one of its five buyers.

A service where AI agents pay to ask a person a question took $90.00 in 30 days from 5 calls, all from a single buyer.

A small x402 seller took in $89.04 in a month from only 45 calls, nearly all of it from a single buyer, so each call was worth a lot.

A small x402 seller took in $87.69 in a month from 56 paid calls. A small share of the payments looked like automated probing.

A small x402 seller took in $85.03 in a month, but only 2 buyers were seen, and nearly all of the money came from one.

A paid API took in $79.71 in a month across 9 buyers, though a little over half of it came from a single one of them.

A small x402 seller took in $76.18 in a month from 881 paid requests, with no single buyer standing out.

A small x402 seller took in $76.72 in a month from 2,613 paid requests spread across many buyers.

A small x402 seller took in $75.3 in a month from 87 paid calls, and one buyer paid most of it.

A small pay-per-request seller took in $75.02 in a month from 78 calls, with nearly all of it from a single buyer.

A small x402 seller took in $74.83 in a month from 531 paid calls. The largest buyer paid about a fifth, so demand looks reasonably spread.

A small service took $73.69 over 30 days from 12 calls and 5 buyers. No buyer stands out, which is a healthier shape than most at this size.

Software paid this small seller $71.15 in a month across 830 calls, but about three-quarters of the money came from one buyer.

Liquidation bots on Morpho earn real money, but the 500 newest contracts earned a median of 2 dollars a month. A few big days and players take most.

An AI go-to-market platform reports 424k dollars of monthly recurring revenue and 1.80M all-time, but the revenue-tracking link expired and last synced on 14 August.

A business-for-sale listing describes AI search-engine software with 515 subscribers making 61 thousand dollars a month, run in about 40 hours a week.

A business sold with 390 AI-made audiobooks reported roughly 11.9k USD a month in royalties, per its seller. A handful of hit titles carried it.

A registry-listed agent shows 43,093 jobs from 9,275 buyers, yet only $554.56 earned over its life. Huge activity can still mean tiny money.

A registry-listed agent shows 1,253 jobs from 187 buyers, $1,297.40 earned over its life, and a success rate of 93.23 percent.

A registry-listed agent shows 1,071 jobs from 300 buyers and $789.80 earned over its life, but only 42.75 percent of jobs succeeded.

A registry-listed agent shows $3,800.57 earned across 3,461 jobs from 372 buyers, with a success rate of 87.93 percent.

Australian shares seem to drop slightly less than the dividend they pay, so buying just before payout has averaged 0.62 percent a trade since 2015. But the edge is shrinking.

Atlassian's Forge marketplace takes no commission up to 1M and shows install counts. But in most niches an established leader already sits on top, and most apps get few reviews.

After directors buy their own company's shares, those shares beat random dates by about 2.6 percent over 60 days. After costs, and against small companies in general, little is left.

Fees brought in 8-17% of capital a year on a fixed-range Uniswap pool, but holding the coins beat it in two of four years because price kept leaving the range.

Projects pay researchers who find flaws in smart contracts, but duplicates are the main loss and bots already catch the easy bugs, so generic AI output tends to earn nothing.

One US company runs a growing set of local-trade websites, each with an AI chat assistant taking job requests. Growth past 30 sites, or real traffic, would suggest it pays.

Among 3,073 Polymarket wallets, traders differ stably from their peers, but after correcting for luck only 1 wallet still stood out. Profit rankings mostly show big accounts.

Groups of near-identical sites reveal what operators are betting on. The research found 8 groups of 5 or more sites, but most appear in one burst and then stop growing.

Over 260 IT contracts worth 100k or more end within about six months, and the end dates are public. Few seem to sort them for small suppliers.

Niche sponsors put up prize pools of 5k-1M to attract developers, and few people enter. A prize can be large per entrant, but it is top-heavy: most entries win nothing.

One freelancer shipped 5 client chatbots in 13 months for high-ticket businesses like aged care. New clients arrived every month or two, with almost no web presence.

Of 170 public chatbots checked, 94 no longer worked. Most were hobby projects, so whether local businesses would pay someone to keep their bots running is still an open question.

Of 392 small web tools whose founders share real revenue, 51.5 percent earn anything. The money is lumpy: one business holds 90 percent of the sample's total.

Four small Polymarket traders seem to keep nearly all their edge even when copied 70 seconds late. The evidence is thin, so treat it as a lead.

About 135 ASX entitlement offers a year leave new buyers time to qualify. After costs, the average result was a loss of 9.0 percent.

One Australian company runs 3,456 local cost-guide pages and sells job leads from them. Its own page shows just 6 house-cleaning jobs nationwide in 30 days.

Nine wallets selling data to AI agents took in under 1 USD from independent buyers in about 2.8 days. A Korean public-data service shows the idea works in theory.

In a few days, 13,831 AI agents registered on one public list, yet only about 0.14 percent had a distinct, working service. Real outside buyers look rare.

A doctor's guide to being found by AI shows '363/450 copies sold' with 87 left. The count stayed identical across a short watch, so the number may be decoration.

On eight prediction-market sites, contracts priced at 95-99.9 cents fail about as often as the price implies. After fees there is little or nothing left. Information, not advice.

Only 20 percent of slots on Bittensor's AI competitions earn anything, though miners overall collect 2,811 TAO a day. The token price decides what that is worth.

A marketplace where AI agents buy tool calls from each other handled 11.97 million requests for 24,533 dollars in fees. 74 percent came from one group of trading agents.

One security-contest platform has paid out 14.3 million dollars in total. The top five contestants hold 21 percent, each with 408 to 933 thousand dollars.

A platform for creators shows 422k dollars in 30 days but only 33k of monthly recurring revenue. Most of the money is creators' fees passing through.

A public dashboard showed 90,148 dollars of fees in 30 days for an agent-services platform, but the payments were near-uniform amounts of 0.073 dollars and look recycled.

An Estonian game publisher filed 3.80 million euros of revenue and 2.83 million euros of net profit for 2024, with 99 percent of the revenue from the US.

Bankr, a launchpad for AI trading agents, shows 32,779 dollars of fees in 7 days and 493,671 in 30 days, but fees are down about 95 percent from September.

Hipages, an Australian marketplace that sells leads to tradespeople, reported 83.1 million Australian dollars of revenue for the year, 97 percent of it recurring, at a 24 percent margin.

Mercor, a marketplace that pays experts to help train AI, says it pays out over 1 million dollars a day. That is the company's own claim.

Chatbase, a builder of AI support agents, says in a payment-processor case study that it reached 10 million dollars of annual recurring revenue with 26 staff and about 10,000 businesses.

Cal AI, an app that counts calories from a photo, is said by its buyer to earn over 30 million dollars a year, with 7 staff plus contractors.

Clanker, a tool that launches tokens, shows 1.35 million dollars of creator fees in 30 days, with monthly totals that swing between 0.3 and 3.3 million.

CoW Protocol, which routes crypto trades through competing solvers, collected 1.70 million dollars of fees in 30 days according to a public dashboard.

A tool that lets crypto users cancel risky permissions took 2,279 dollars from 21 payers on one network and 3,565 dollars from 10 payers on another in 30 days.

An AI yield agent earned 7.36 million dollars of fees in a year but only 74 thousand dollars in the latest 30 days, a fall of about 95 percent.

Virtuals, a platform that launches AI agents and runs an agent marketplace, shows 13,363 dollars of protocol revenue over 7 days and 105,964 over 30 days.

A two-month challenge to break AI agents, run on Gray Swan's arena, paid 171,800 dollars to 161 people in 2025.

XBOW, a company that automates security testing with AI, has about 1,060 reports on the HackerOne bounty platform and under 40 thousand dollars of bounties from them.

A tool that manages people's liquidity-pool positions automatically managed 538,804 dollars of fees in 30 days and keeps an 8 percent commission on them.

One new crypto app fell from 22.4 million dollars a month to 2.2 million, another from 407 thousand to 6 thousand, a third from 987 thousand to 3.2 thousand.

A business-for-sale listing says an AI song-gift shop took 2.66 million dollars of revenue and 664 thousand of profit in 8 months from 126,752 orders averaging 21 dollars.

Kaggle ran 44 cash competitions in 2024 worth 4.25 million dollars in prizes, and the DrivenData platform has paid 5.3 million dollars over its life.

Three shops that sell downloadable templates on a handmade-goods marketplace show sales counters of 177.5K, 214.6K and 158.6K, at median prices of 24.00, 7.20 and 7.36 dollars.