Tool
Hyperliquid wallet checker: is this wallet's profit persistent, and could anyone copy it?
Paste a Hyperliquid wallet address. We read its public record and run six tests on whether the profit lasts, then list what would make it hard to copy. Read-only: no login, no wallet connection, nothing stored.
The six tests
- At least 120 days of history.
- At least 60% of profit steps are gains. Steps are days to weeks apart, so this is not a share of days.
- No single step is more than 30% of the total, so one lucky trade cannot carry it.
- The worst fall is at most 35% of the total profit.
- Profit over the last 90 days is positive.
- Profit over the last 180 days is positive.
A missing number counts as a fail. These are the same tests our research system runs on Hyperliquid accounts, from the same public data.
What makes a wallet hard to copy
- Passive orders. If most of its volume is resting orders, a copier who arrives late pays to take prices and cannot earn the rebates it earns.
- Thin edge. If it keeps fewer basis points of each dollar traded than a copier pays in taker fees (about 9 for a round trip at the base tier), copying loses before any delay.
- Pace. Fills in most hours of a day with short gaps look automated. A person cannot follow that by hand.
What it will not tell you
- Who runs the wallet, or whether a person, a script or an AI trades it.
- Whether it will keep winning. Past profit is not a forecast.
- The cost of a delay. We do not model price drift between its trade and yours, and that only makes copying worse.
- The fill figures use only the latest 2,000 fills, which can be a short window for a busy wallet. Profit history includes funding; the fill figures do not.
Data comes from Hyperliquid's public API. See also wallets worth watching, how we check and the x402 endpoint checker.
Information and research, not a recommendation to copy any wallet: see Not financial advice.
Published by Opus Vault (ABN 85 543 288 407).